I am just come across a body of a feminist what about our refuge action misses. I hate to say rarely, but here it is true, nothing understood, and no idea. Let's start with the refutation. ?
Last week they struck again. The anti-feminists to" Pretty Boy "Rene Kuhn strange thing to find the Lionheart
a list. addresses of shelters they wanted to publicize it could be cleaned up to this alleged training camps for the men's hostility to last. "
is supposedly good. There are numerous reports on the feminist attitude and men fueled hostility in women's refuges.
"well-much ado about nothing, but still: I know someone who had so seek a shelter - fifteen years she still had to endure the blows of her husband, in the hope that it will be better."
Then this woman - if it exists - one big exception. For the vast majority of women in refuges initiated domestic violence or fighting back, at least. The scientific studies have demonstrated .
"Until now I had the association of Anti-feminists rather ridiculed. So much driven by personal, deep-rooted frustration and sheer hatred of the women who left that gender equality offices, seemed to me not really capable of fruitful discussion "
course, frustration, hatred of women, etc. -.. Missing is the too short penis.'s funny that they left out the.
Why you should also deal with the serious abuses of feminism ? It's much easier for the critic simply blame frustration and hatred of women!
"But now it not only shook me about this statement, but according to readers' letters and many more critical feminism Man "
I want to insinuate anything, but I suspect that there who also plays a certain lack of awareness about prevailing conditions in and around shelters.
" It is fair to criticize certain situations, without calling for violence. "
?
Where we call for violence
"You can and should - as a man above all - analyze the male image of today. You can find a bad divorce law and the principle of "walking dads" who get their children only once every few weeks to face. "
But of course you are allowed your male image question - but only as we do the feminists ! And the present term divorce is bad, it is thus not simply an option to find it bad. Of course you can see the quite different when one is Systemprofiteuse .
"It also needs shelters, which can find refuge from domestic violence at men. Sowa will not, however, if the roles are cemented by" feminine women "and calls for" real men "."
of which there are vanishingly few and they are not opposed to women's shelters funded by the princely state. And the last sentence again is nonsense - as opposed to the feminists we do not write any of the people on the role corsets by government pressure.
"And it will have to pay as long as the dads after divorce, to paid work and family work between men and women are equally distributed."
Is that a threat? Or induce desired causality? wife alimony is no ifs and buts abolished, as called for in the current world week - women are modern and emancipated enough to earn their money themselves - they must therefore not their laziness behind the outdated stereotype utility of the male hide.
"While the women have partially re-invented and expanded their options are, some men still trapped in the old social expectations of how a man should be, so he is a man."
This is primarily maintained by women - because they benefit from it most. But that would require you look beyond their own horizons can feminist.
"But where are the men who deal with it normal? Does it really frustrated, loud barking representative, or is this just the male equivalent at that women bra-burning and "tail-off"-Challenge? Does such a thing to be heard at all "
Countless men's organizations as Manndat, agent, IGM, team and many more have tried for decades to make themselves heard - but were all of the feminists, the judicial and . the media ignored and ignored and now they are the anti-feminists - to blame
"I hope that at last a reasonable mix of men and fathers' movement in the discussion.. One which is not too bad to talk delicate, unpleasant issues - but at a certain Level. One who can meet as equals - and must. One that does not per se have an "anti" with the name. "
had When the feminist movement interested ever for its level and intelligence. You see themselves to only the pseudo-scientific ideologies of the matriarchy and the Genderismus to, if you want to make sure the abuses of feminist "intelligence." Or the abysmal men hate feminism to gather information on the level of feminism.
It is therefore not followers of an obsolete feminism, about the level of other Judging.
"And you can not just dismiss as an extreme patriarchal spinners who are not" serious. "
But obviously, these "extreme patriarchal Spinner" seriously enough to get it before them in the pants, and to devote an entire article, huh?
Thus we see that in the 21st Century, the followers of feminism, despite increasingly strong backlash stubbornly refuse to learn and to question their own position before they open their mouth.
feminism: I do not know and understand nothing
0 comments:
Post a Comment