So to chew and digest a lot of us on the following section, I calmed down a few days can take a break. Before Saturday's with P. de Lubac sj any further. Personally, I think so, that the mere that what follows here, the good qualifies Père Doctor of the Church.
"But the inflexibility in matters of faith and love for the tradition to communicate with the real man of the Church in hardness, contempt, heart drought. He is ready to receive, can lock themselves in a fortress of rigid defenses. He does not forget that the Church not only in the main, but also in the members' loud 'yes' must carry with them, and that any objection may be only the reverse side of a stronger affirmation. Any more than the church itself, he is the spirit of the compromise space, but he still wants to as 'all the doors open, can be found by the quite different kind spirits to access a truth'. As little as he wants 'which are cumbersome, have converted', and the laudable Restraint, which also placed James the Apostle Council of the day seems to him more humane and wise, even the ways of God to awesome than the claims of some zealots. Following the same model he wants to be rotated by any exclusive thought the head, in the manner of the common fan, because he believes the church - their whole dogma and the history of heresy prove it - 'that salvation lies only in the balance'. He also confuses Orthodox faith and strength with no tightness or inertia of the mind. non ideo quia durum aliquid, ideo rectum [Not because it is something hard / uncomfortable, it is therefore all right, Scipio] ( Augustin ). He does not forget that it is one of its tasks 'set out for the people of his time, the things necessary to salvation'. He is carefully trying to ensure that in him gradually gain a general idea of the superiority over the person of Jesus Christ . As much as him on the purity of doctrine and theological clarity is, however much he struggles to let sink the mystery of faith into an ideology. Its full and unconditional loyalty decreases even to a kind of ecclesiastical chauvinism. He checked himself, then he is afraid he might fall and the terrible error that 'theologians', the 'as intelligent and' become 'the Gospel to make a scientific object, and imagine to have this more complete knowledge than the average of the Faithful, while still' often now they understand the least in the sense Jesus Christ . " (The Church. - Einsiedeln. John, 1968, p. 225 - 226)
to previous section here
0 comments:
Post a Comment